- Title Page
- Outline
- Mountain Waves
- Momentum Flux and Pressure Drag
- Gravity Wave Drag Parameterrization
- Transient Mountain Waves 1
- Transient Mountain Waves 2
- Goals of the Study
- Methodology
- The Synoptic-scale Flow
- Construction of Synoptic-scale Flow
- Initial Condition Ingredients
- Boundary Conditions
- Domain Setup and Model Resolution
- u' and theta' forced by h = 250 m
- Ray Tracing Theory 1
- Ray Tracing Theory 2
- Variations in k and m
- Horizonal Group Velocity is Doppler Shifted by the Synoptic Flow
- How Does the Domain Averaged Momentum Flux Vary with Time and Height ?
- Hypothetical z-t Momentum Flux Distribution
- Momentum Flux Forced by h = 250 m
- Vertidcal Group Velocity Increases with the Speed of the Synoptic Flow
- WKB Ray Tracing for U = U(t)
- Ray Path Diagram: x-z plane
- Rap Path Diagram: z-t plane
- Conservation of Wave Action
- Momentum Flux Changes Along a Ray
- Change of Intrinsic Frequency
- Comparison of Momentum Fluxes from the Model and the WKB Reconstruction
- Influence of Confluence and Difluence
- Momentum Flux for Higher Mountains
- Pressure Drag Evolution
- Nonlinear Pressure Drag Evolution
- Purturbation theta (h = 1 km)
- Purturbation pressure (h = 1 km)
- Nonlinearity and Past History
- Decelerating flow promotes wave breaking (h = 1 km)
- theta and K for h = 1.5 km
- Large Scale Flow Response
- Divergence of Momentum Flux
- Momentum Budget fot h = 250 m
- Global Momentum Budget
- A Hypothesis for the Global Budget
- Global Momentum Budget (h = 250 m)
- Time-integrated momentum flux
- Large-Scale Response to Breaking Waves
- Forcing for Zonal Mean Flow h = 1.5 km
- Momentum Budget-area-integrated perspective
- Global Response for h = 1.5 km
- Spatial Response
- Difference Fields(z = 1.5 km, t = 25 hr)
- Difference Fields(z = 1.5 km, t = 0 hr)
- Difference Fields(z = 1.5 km, t = 50 hr)
- Difference Fields(z = 3.5 km, t = 50 hr)
- PV Dynamics
- PV location predicted by trajectory calculation
- B & PV at 292--298 K at 28.75 h
- Can the flow response be explained by balanced dynamics ?
- u purturbation vs balanced u'(z = 1.5 km, t = 50 hr)
- u purturbation vs balanced u'(z = 3.5 km, t = 50 hr)
- piecewise PV inversion
- How does the zonally averaged momentum and PV distribution depend on mountain height?
- h = 125 m
- h = 250 m
- h = 500 m
- h = 1 km
- h = 1.5 km
- The Balanced Response Makes No Contribution to the Domain Average!
- Can we recover the spatial response using a GWD parameterization scheme?
- GWD parameterization Experiment 1
- GWD parameterization Experiment 2
- PV generation
- Potential Problem for GWD parameterization
- More Curl, but Same Domain Averaged Drag
- Summary
- Summary -- quasi-linear regime (h < 125 m)
- Summary -- moderately nonlinear regime (250 m < h < 1 km)
- Sumamry -- highly nonlinear regime (h = 1.5 km)
- RealPlayer(ver.9 or later) is need for listening our video. it can be downloaded from RealNetworks Inc.